Posted On: April 30, 2008

Jumbo Barge Becomes Wedged Against a Railway Bridge

A jumbo hopper barge became wedged against a railway bridge in Burlington, Iowa along the Mississippi River after five barges broke loose and slammed into two bridges; it took 63 hours to free it after the barge accident.

Line boats and towboats were used to free the barge and help push it up the river. Allegedly, the barges broke free from a staging area upstream. The owners of the barges were unknown, and the barges were loaded with grain or coal. Although bridges are designed to absorb an impact, there was concern about the force of the impact following the Missouri barge accident.

In situations such as that above, insurance becomes very important in order to recover for loss where there isn't a specified cause or claim per se. Under the Corpus Juris Secundum, the following are Marine Insurance policy requirements in terms of giving notice and proof of loss to the insurer in order to be able to recover.

The giving of notice and preliminary proofs of loss is a condition precedent to a recovery under the usual form of marine policy. Notice of loss must be given as mandated by the insurance policy. Generally, notice of loss given by the insured to an insurance broker does not constitute notice to the insurance company without exceptional circumstances.

The requirements of giving immediate written notice and filing written proofs of loss and interest must be construed in accord with their purpose and with the reasonable expectations of the parties, and the insured is allowed a reasonable period in which to fulfill such requirements. Timely notice is given under the immediate notice requirement where the insured's broker leaves a recorded telephone message for the insurance company on the day of the occurrence, which may result in a claim, and later writes to the company to confirm the information.

Continue reading " Jumbo Barge Becomes Wedged Against a Railway Bridge " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Google.com Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at del.icio.us Digg Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Digg.com Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Spurl.net Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Simpy.com Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at NewsVine Blink this Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at blinklist.com Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Furl.net Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at reddit.com Fark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Fark.com Bookmark Jumbo%20Barge%20Becomes%20Wedged%20Against%20a%20Railway%20Bridge at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 29, 2008

Third Party Injuries in Missouri Dog Bite Cases

A 6-year-old girl was hospitalized after a dog in St. Augustine, Florida attacked her. The girl was immediately rushed to the hospital and underwent four hours of surgery to treat more than 100 dog bite wounds. The young girl was on vacation and playing outside, when the dog, weighing 20 pounds more than her, attacked.

The girl's neighbor heard cries for help and came to the young girl's rescue. The neighbor was eventually able to fight off the dog, but also hurt herself in the process; the dog bit her, and she broke her toe after kicking the animal several times to stop the attack.

In such situations, it is lawful for a person to repel an attack by a dog for the purpose of defending himself/herself or third persons against harm threatened by an animal. It is important to note, however, that the law of self-defense only permits aggression for the purpose of meeting aggression. This means revenge or any action taken after an attack is over is generally unlawful. Even if an animal has previously attacked or displayed aggressive behavior, by law, self-defense is usually not deemed necessary anymore because the threat of danger is not imminent, or great enough.

If a person does intervene in a Missouri dog attack to protect another person or a pet from injury by a dog, and that person is injured, the owner of the dog will be held responsible for the injury, under the legal principle called the "rescue doctrine." The "rescue doctrine" is set forth in case law and in the statutory law of some states.

The general principle is that, where a person has negligently managed his own person, land or chattels, he is liable for the foreseeable consequences. (The word chattels is a legal term that refers to property, like a pet in this case.) A foreseeable consequence is injury to a rescuer. The court typically finds that when a person, such as the dog owner here, puts himself or others in danger, it is foreseeable that someone else will attempt to rescue those in danger, making the dog owner liable to any possible injury arising from such scenario.

Continue reading " Third Party Injuries in Missouri Dog Bite Cases " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Google.com Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at del.icio.us Digg Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Digg.com Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Spurl.net Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Simpy.com Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at NewsVine Blink this Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at blinklist.com Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Furl.net Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at reddit.com Fark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Fark.com Bookmark Third%20Party%20Injuries%20in%20Missouri%20Dog%20Bite%20Cases at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 28, 2008

Parents File Premises Liability Suit After Son Dies At Missouri Water Park

The legal battle over the drowning of a Missouri child continues as the family of the boy claims the pool is liable for damages because of inadequate supervision at the swimming facility. The 6-year-old boy drowned last summer at the Swimmin' Hole, a private water park in rural Joplin, while on a field trip with the Boys & Girls Club.

Authorities ruled the death an accident, but alleged "a lack of supervision" on the part of club chaperons and the water-park employees. The parents have filed suit against the Boys & Girls Club and the water park owners.

Actions to recover for swimming-pool accidents at hotels, motels, resorts, and private or public association or club facilities generally follow standard negligence principles. This means that the swimming pool owners and chaperons in this case must have had a duty of care to the little boy, breached that duty, which resulted in injury that was directly caused by the breach of duty. The plaintiff often attempts to show that the defendant violated statutory requirements for swimming pools. According to the American Jurisprudence 2nd, in actions to recover for injury or death suffered in a swimming pool, plaintiffs can successfully establish the defendant's liability on numerous grounds.

In some cases, the defendant's failure to provide any lifeguard or other supervisory services at its pool has been found to render the defendant liable. In other cases where the defendant provided lifeguard or other supervisory services, but the plaintiff claimed they were inadequate, such as the case above, courts have split decisions, depending on the magnitude and reasonableness of the inadequacy of the supervisory services.

Continue reading " Parents File Premises Liability Suit After Son Dies At Missouri Water Park " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Google.com Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at del.icio.us Digg Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Digg.com Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Spurl.net Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Simpy.com Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at NewsVine Blink this Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at blinklist.com Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Furl.net Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at reddit.com Fark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Fark.com Bookmark Parents%20File%20Premises%20Liability%20Suit%20After%20Son%20Dies%20At%20Missouri%20Water%20Park at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 25, 2008

Use Caution When Sharing The Road With Motorcycles

As most motorcycle accident injuries are statistically at motorists' fault over motorcyclists, it is important for drivers to keep in mind the following things while driving alongside motorcycles.

First, respect the motorcycle as any other vehicle. The motorcycle is a vehicle with all of the same privileges as any other vehicle on the road, meaning although a motorcycle is smaller, it is still deserving of a full lane to travel.

Second, look out for motorcyclists on the highway and especially at intersections. Make sure you signal your intentions when driving near a motorcyclist, just as they should when changing lanes and making turns.

Next, anticipate a motorcyclist's maneuver because they are impacted more by roadway conditions that other vehicles. This means when there are obstructions such as potholes, debris, and other road conditions that drivers may ignore and a car may easily navigate, look out for the actions a motorcyclist may take. Motorcyclists likely have to make more evasive actions in order to avoid the St. Louis Motorcycle Accidents; so if you pay attention and account for such, safety will be greatly increased.

Continue reading " Use Caution When Sharing The Road With Motorcycles " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Google.com Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at del.icio.us Digg Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Digg.com Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Spurl.net Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Simpy.com Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at NewsVine Blink this Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at blinklist.com Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Furl.net Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at reddit.com Fark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Fark.com Bookmark Use%20Caution%20When%20Sharing%20The%20Road%20With%20Motorcycles at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 24, 2008

Man Inured In Truck vs. Animal Accident

A Nixa man sustained injuries after his truck struck a cow that wandered onto the road. The Missouri Highway Patrol said the man was driving on Missouri 13 when the truck accident occurred. After the truck hit the cow, it ran off the road and struck a tree.

In the event that an animal is struck by a motor vehicle or an animal collides with a motor vehicle, the surrounding circumstances must be evaluated to determine whether or not the motorist is liable. According to the American Jurisprudence, which is an encyclopedia of United States law, §104 Animals on Highways or Streets, liability is regularly assessed by the following standards.

Typically, a motorist is not an insurer of the safety of animals on the highway. However, a motorist is generally required to exercise reasonable care to avoid injuring or killing livestock or other animals on the highway. A motorist's failure to do so makes him/her liable to the owner of an animal injured or killed.

Courts across the U.S. vary in their interpretation of fault and liability when dealing with animals on the road. In some jurisdictions, authority requires that a motorist exercise the highest degree of care toward animals on the highway. Other courts have found the motorist owes no duty, or only a duty to refrain from gross negligence, as to animals at large. The most common rule is that even a law against permitting animals to run at large, does not relieve the motorist of responsibility for negligent injury to the animals.

Finding that a motorist was negligent in a collision with an animal requires that the motorist was driving at excessive speed, failed to keep a proper lookout on the road, or failed to reduce their speed or keep a safe distance while passing an animal. However, where the driver of an automobile, in attempting to pass an animal, slows down and takes due precaution but still injures an animal, the courts generally find the driver was not negligent. Also, a Missouri auto collision between a car driven with reasonable care and an animal suddenly running onto the highway from a point where it could not have easily been seen by a driver using normal caution, is frequently regarded by the courts as an unavoidable accident. In such instance, a motorist will not be liable, unless the collision occurred while he/she was driving at excessive or unreasonable speed.

Continue reading " Man Inured In Truck vs. Animal Accident " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Google.com Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at del.icio.us Digg Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Digg.com Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Spurl.net Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Simpy.com Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at NewsVine Blink this Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at blinklist.com Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Furl.net Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at reddit.com Fark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Fark.com Bookmark Man%20Inured%20In%20Truck%20vs.%20Animal%20Accident at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 23, 2008

17 Year Old Girl Killed Crossing Railroad Tracks

A 17-year-old girl was killed when a southbound Amtrak train hit her in Kent, Washington. The young girl was crossing the tracks while she was talking on her cell phone. Witnesses allege that the girl was simply not paying attention prior to the train accident, while she crossed the tracks.

However, cell phone usage was not the only issue at hand, as the surrounding area also made the tracks difficult to see because the tracks are surrounded by buildings and apartments, and the girl was hit at an unmarked crossing. Authorities say that this is the fifth fatality on Washington rails this year that involve unmarked railroad crossings.

Most marked railroad crossing include flashing lights and a gate, but in some remote areas, tracks may remain unmarked. It is, therefore, essential that everyone exercise caution when coming to railroad tracks of any nature, as surrounding circumstances, similar to the railroad accident above, may make it difficult to see a train.

The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) typically uses three types of traffic controlling devices at railroad crossings to alert those nearby of a train. The following lists the three devices and details driver responsibility when approaching them:

1. A crossbuck is a type of YIELD sign: the driver should be prepared to stop at least 4.5 m (15 ft) before the near rail if necessary, unless and until the driver can make a reasonable decision that there are no trains in hazardous proximity to the crossing, and it is safe to cross.

2. Operating flashing lights have the same function as a STOP sign: a vehicle is required to stop completely at least 4.5 m (15 ft) short of the near rail. Then, even though the flashing lights may still be operating, the driver is allowed to proceed after stopping (subject to State or local laws), when safe to do so.

3. Flashing lights with lowered gates are equivalent to a red vehicular traffic signal indication: a vehicle is required to stop short of the gate and remain stopped until the gates go up.

Continue reading " 17 Year Old Girl Killed Crossing Railroad Tracks " »

Bookmark: Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Google.com Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at del.icio.us Digg 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Digg.com Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Spurl.net Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Simpy.com Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at NewsVine Blink this 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at blinklist.com Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Furl.net Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at reddit.com Fark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Fark.com Bookmark 17%20Year%20Old%20Girl%20Killed%20Crossing%20Railroad%20Tracks at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 22, 2008

High School Coach injured badly In Motorcycle Accident

In Clute, Texas a high school golf coach was badly injured after his motorcycle collided with a pickup truck. He has been listed in critical condition, suffering from head injury, broken arms, legs, ribs, and a severe foot injury. The motorcycle accident occurred when the vehicle meged onto the highway and did not see the motorcyclist resulting in a .

The motorcycle ran head-on into the driver's side of the truck, causing significant external and internal injuries. The motorcyclist was not wearing his helmet, the pickup truck driver was not injured, and neither was speeding.

Helmet safety is always an issue of debate, as some states require helmet use where others do not, and some motorcyclists claim that helmets hinder their vision and hearing capabilities. The NHTSA sponsored a study of fifty motorcyclists of various ages and riding experiences to assess the abilities of motorcyclists wearing helmets. The study tests motorcyclists' abilities:

(1) to visually detect the presence of vehicles in adjacent lanes before changing lanes, and (2) to detect traffic sounds when operating at normal highway speeds

The vision results showed that most riders recover the lateral field of view that may be lost by wearing a helmet, simply by turning their heads a little farther. Helmet use did not hamper the ability of riders to see traffic or increase the time needed to visually check for nearby traffic.

The hearing results showed there were no significant difference in riders' ability to hear the auditory signals regardless of whether they were wearing a helmet or not. At higher speeds, wind noise obviously makes hearing more difficult in general, but the helmets did not affect hearing abilities. Overall, any possible drawbacks of helmet use are severely negated by the benefits in terms of the protection offered in the event of a motorcycle accident.

Continue reading " High School Coach injured badly In Motorcycle Accident " »

Bookmark: Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Google.com Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at del.icio.us Digg High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Digg.com Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Spurl.net Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Simpy.com Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at NewsVine Blink this High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at blinklist.com Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Furl.net Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at reddit.com Fark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Fark.com Bookmark High%20School%20Coach%20injured%20badly%20In%20Motorcycle%20Accident at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 20, 2008

7 Precautions That Can Help Prevent Missouri Dog Attacks

A 24-years-old woman in Longville, Louisiana was killed in her home by two family-owned pit bulls while she was sleeping. One of the pit bulls was female and one male. It was suspected by the woman's family members that she may have had a seizure while sleeping and the dogs reacted to it. The dogs bit her several times, resulting in her death; no charges are expected to be filed in this Missouri Dog Bite Case.

Pit bulls are often deemed dangerous dogs. Animal People News found that 2 breeds accounted for 71% of all dog bite-related fatalities in 2007. They were pit bulls and rottweilers. Breed is one of the most important factors in determining the dangerous tendencies of a dog; however, the study also found that biters are over six times as likely to be male than female, 2.6 times as likely to be intact than neutered, and three times as likely to be chained as unchained.

It is suggested that dangerous dog owners take certain precautions to ensure that the likelihood of a dog attack will be reduced. The following are some recommendations:

1. Spay or neuter your dog- this can decrease aggression when done at an early age. The optimal age is between 6-9 months, particularly with male dogs.

2. Socialize your dog- by introduce your dog at an early age to community parks, family and friends, busy sidewalks and other animals, the less chance it will feel threatened in new experiences and the less likely it may choose to bite.

3. Exercise your dog- all dogs require exercise, but generally the dangerous, more robust breeds require much more.

4. Train your dog- obedience training trains the owner as much as it trains the dog; lack of obedience training can prove dangerous for the community.

Continue reading " 7 Precautions That Can Help Prevent Missouri Dog Attacks " »

Bookmark: Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Google.com Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at del.icio.us Digg 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Digg.com Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Spurl.net Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Simpy.com Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at NewsVine Blink this 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at blinklist.com Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Furl.net Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at reddit.com Fark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Fark.com Bookmark 7%20Precautions%20That%20Can%20Help%20Prevent%20Missouri%20Dog%20Attacks at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 16, 2008

Couple Files $40 Million Lawsuit Against Medical Center

A $40 million medical malpractice lawsuit was filed by a Woodbury, Tennessee couple, against Middle Tennessee Medical Center, Murfreesboro Medical Clinic and their doctor. The couple alleges the negligence of those defendants, during their daughter's delivery, has caused the girl severe medical conditions.

The couple alleges their daughter, who was born at MTMC, suffers from severe brain damage, cerebral palsy, developmental delay and seizures. The $40 million request is for compensatory damages. Compensatory damages are paid to compensate a claimant for loss, injury, or harm suffered by another's breach of duty.

The suit claims, two nurses failed to follow the doctor's instructions during the girl's delivery. The two nurses were employees of MTMC. The doctor, who delivered this girl at MTMC, was separately in private practice at Murfreesboro Medical Clinic.

The couple claims the doctor was negligent and deviated from standard professional practices too. The defendants claim the couple was negligent because they failed to follow doctor's advice on multiple occasions after the child was born.

In Missouri, the following elements must be proven in a medical negligence claim:

1. Act or omission by defendant that fails to meet the requisite medical standard of care;
2. The act or omission involves negligence; and
3. A causal connection exists between the act or omission and plaintiff's injury or illness.

Continue reading " Couple Files $40 Million Lawsuit Against Medical Center " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Google.com Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at del.icio.us Digg Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Digg.com Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Spurl.net Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Simpy.com Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at NewsVine Blink this Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at blinklist.com Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Furl.net Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at reddit.com Fark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Fark.com Bookmark Couple%20Files%20%2440%20Million%20Lawsuit%20Against%20Medical%20Center at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 15, 2008

Two Dead In Tragic Colorado Semi Truck Accident

A truck accident in Glenwood Springs, Colorado occurred when a semi-truck carrying a load of 38-foot steel pipes was traveling on an elevated section of the highway. The semi-truck was allegedly speeding and took a corner too fast, rolling over and causing the load of steel pipes to spill on the lanes below. The load of pipes hit another semi-truck, a pick-up truck and a sedan.

The driver of the second semi, who was hit with the pipes, and the passenger in the pick-up both died. Charges have not been decided for the driver of the initial semi; generally however, a car accident resulting from direct fault, such as speeding, is a good sign liability.


Government regulations fix speed limits to state the legal maximum speed to which is deemed reasonable and proper for a certain area, while taking into consideration other surrounding circumstances. Violations of the stated speed limit may determine liability for negligence.

Under the Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), the basic rule of speed states that no person should drive a vehicle on the highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent, nor should any person drive at a greater speed than will permit the driver to exercise proper control, to decrease speed or to stop as may be necessary to avoid a Missouri truck collision.

Further, operators of motor vehicles must exercise reasonable and ordinary care for the protection and safety of themselves and others, and have due regard for the traffic conditions under which they are driving: the failure to observe such duties constitutes evidence of negligence.

Continue reading " Two Dead In Tragic Colorado Semi Truck Accident " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Google.com Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at del.icio.us Digg Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Digg.com Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Spurl.net Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Simpy.com Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at NewsVine Blink this Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at blinklist.com Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Furl.net Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at reddit.com Fark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Fark.com Bookmark Two%20Dead%20In%20Tragic%20Colorado%20Semi%20Truck%20Accident at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 10, 2008

Drunk Driving Catches up to Cardinals Player

Former St. Louis Cardinals utility player Scott Spiezio pleaded guilty April 7 to DUI and hit-and-run charges in Newport Beach, California.

The charges stem from a December single-car crash in Newport Beach, a tony Los Angeles suburb. According to the Associated Press, Spiezio crashed his car into a curb and a fence, then fled on foot to his condo complex, where he punched a neighbor. He was sentenced to three years of probation, 80 hours of community service, alcohol education and treatment, and $1,700 in restitution and fines.

The plea agreement caps off a difficult year for Spiezio, son of 1967 World Series-winning Cardinal Ed Spiezio. According to the AP, the younger Spiezio was released from his contract by the Cardinals in February, after a warrant was issued for his arrest in connection with the DUI accident. Despite having played on two World Series championship-winning teams, including the 2006 Cardinals, Spiezio agreed to a minor-league contract with the Atlanta Braves in March.

Continue reading " Drunk Driving Catches up to Cardinals Player " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Google.com Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at del.icio.us Digg Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Digg.com Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Spurl.net Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Simpy.com Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at NewsVine Blink this Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at blinklist.com Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Furl.net Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at reddit.com Fark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Fark.com Bookmark Drunk%20Driving%20Catches%20up%20to%20Cardinals%20Player at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 9, 2008

St. Louis Women Dies in Tractor-Trailer Crash

Two St. Louis-area young women died and two more were injured after a deadly crash in the early morning hours of April 2.

One vehicle entered the St. Clair ramp in East St. Louis onto Interstates 55/70 at around 3:45 in the morning. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, one driver crossed several lanes immediately upon entering the interstate, into the path of a tractor-trailer truck.

Authorities said the truck "t-boned" the passenger side of the car, killing two. Two people were injured and one reported in critical condition and one in fair condition as of April 3. The driver of the truck was not injured.

As experienced St. Louis car and truck accident lawyers, we're not surprised that the truck driver survived without serious injury. Statistics show that drivers of large trucks, including tractor-trailers like the one here, are rarely killed or seriously injured in accidents.

Continue reading " St. Louis Women Dies in Tractor-Trailer Crash " »

Bookmark: Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Google.com Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at del.icio.us Digg St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Digg.com Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Spurl.net Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Simpy.com Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at NewsVine Blink this St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at blinklist.com Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Furl.net Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at reddit.com Fark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Fark.com Bookmark St.%20Louis%20Women%20Dies%20in%20Tractor-Trailer%20Crash at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 8, 2008

Missouri Man Dies in Car-Train Accident

A man died from injuries sustained in a car-train accident in Monroe County, Missouri. The man was allegedly driving when his car got stuck on railroad tracks; an electromotive train that could not be stopped struck his vehicle. A passenger in his car also sustained serious injuries. The railroad crossing was not controlled by signals.

The Federal Railroad Association (FRA) has implemented regulations to specifically handle "railroad signal systems." This regulation is in reference to a block signal system, which means an interlocking, automatic train stop, train control, or cab-signal device, or a similar device, intended to promote safety in railroad operations.

The FRA requires that a railroad carrier periodically inspect and test the signal systems and report any malfunctions or accidents to prevent such dangerous events. A railroad carrier is supposed to report to the Secretary of Transportation a failure of a signal system to function as intended. If the failure results in a railroad accident or incident causing injury to an individual or property that is required to be reported, the carrier owning or maintaining the signal system has to immediately report the fact of the accident or incident to the Secretary.

Continue reading " Missouri Man Dies in Car-Train Accident " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Google.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at del.icio.us Digg Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Digg.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Spurl.net Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Simpy.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at NewsVine Blink this Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at blinklist.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Furl.net Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at reddit.com Fark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Fark.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Dies%20in%20Car-Train%20Accident at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 7, 2008

Missouri Man Injured When Vehicle Rear-Ends Tractor Trailer

A man sustained minor injuries in a truck accident in Lawrence County, Missouri when his vehicle rear-ended a tractor-trailor. The driver of the vehicle was taken to the hospital after he lost control of his vehicle, misjudged the distance between the vehicles, and ran into a tractor-trailer. Tractor-trailers are among a class that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration separates in terms of regulations and guidelines.

The FMCSA establishes tractor-trailer safety guidelines by evaluating a trucks:
1. size
2. weight
3. route destination
4. length
5. width


The length of tractor-trailers is often a point of confusion because as trailers are added onto various types vehicles, the overall guidelines in terms length may seem to vary to the average citizen. The FMCSA provides tractor-trailer regulations and information at http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/. The FMCSA has the following guidelines for length involving tractor-trailors:

(a) The length provisions of the STAA apply only to the following types of vehicle combinations:
(1) Truck tractor–semitrailer
(2) Truck tractor–semitrailer–trailer.

The length provisions apply only when these combinations are in use on the National Network or in transit between these highways and terminals or service locations
The length provisions referred to in paragraph of this section include the following:

(1) No State shall impose a length limitation of less than 48 feet on a semitrailer operating in a truck tractor–semitrailer combination.
(2) No State shall impose a length limitation of less than 28 feet on any semitrailer or trailer operating in a truck tractor–semitrailer–trailer combination.
(3) No State shall impose an overall length limitation on commercial vehicles operating in truck tractor–semitrailer or truck tractor–semitrailer–trailer combinations.
(4) No State shall prohibit commercial motor vehicles operating in truck tractor–semitrailer–trailer combinations.
(5) No State shall prohibit the operation of semitrailers or trailers which are 281/2 feet long when operating in a truck tractor–semitrailer–trailer combination if such a trailer or semitrailer was in actual and lawful operation on December 1, 1982, and such combination had an overall length not exceeding 65 feet.

Continue reading " Missouri Man Injured When Vehicle Rear-Ends Tractor Trailer " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Google.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at del.icio.us Digg Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Digg.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Spurl.net Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Simpy.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at NewsVine Blink this Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at blinklist.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Furl.net Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at reddit.com Fark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Fark.com Bookmark Missouri%20Man%20Injured%20When%20Vehicle%20Rear-Ends%20Tractor%20Trailer at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 5, 2008

Dog Bite Attacks

The Texas Supreme Court recently ruled against the "first bite" rule, saying pet owners should not be freed from liability once a dog attack begins. The longstanding rule was overturned because a woman who was attacked by three dogs and suffered wounds that reportedly took two years to heal was prevented from suing the dog owners. The court felt the "first bite" rule to be an injustice in this case and wanted to prevent the same injustice from happening again.

However, Missouri continues to follow the "one bite" rule, which means that if a dog does not have known dangerous behavior, the owner is granted a degree of freedom from responsibility, but such freedom from liability is not absolute.

Dog bite victims in Missouri can also base claims on premises liability, general negligence, and negligence per se.

1. Premises liability basically means a victim must prove the owner had knowledge of the dangerous propensities of his or her dog. Laws differ based on if the victim was a trespasser, licensee (entering the owner's land with permission), or invitee (entering the land with reasonable benefit to the owner). The dog owner is subject to liability for harm to licensees if the dog presents a foreseeable danger the possessor is aware, and for harm to an invitee if the dog presents a foreseeable danger, which the owner knows or should have known.

Continue reading " Dog Bite Attacks " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Google.com Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at del.icio.us Digg Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Digg.com Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Spurl.net Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Simpy.com Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at NewsVine Blink this Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at blinklist.com Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Furl.net Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at reddit.com Fark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Fark.com Bookmark Dog%20Bite%20Attacks at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 4, 2008

Truck Accidents

In Lemont, Illinois a man was hospitalized after his tanker full of gasoline overturned on Interstate Highway 55. His gasoline tanker ignited, and although the man was able to crawl out of his truck, he was hospitalized and treated for third-degree burns.

This diesel filled tanker continued to burn for four hours, making driving conditions dangerous with closed ramps and piling traffic. Tankers carrying hazardous materials must follow certain truck laws in order to comply with federal regulations aiming to prevent such dangerous driving conditions.

The FMCSA requires transporters of hazardous materials to acquire a Hazardous Materials (HM) Safety Permit. The following materials require a permit:

1.Radioactive Materials
2.Explosives
3.Toxic by Inhalation Materials:
4.Methane

The HM safety permit are available at the FMCSA District Office or online at http://li-public.fmcsa.dot.gov/LIVIEW/PKG_REGISTRATION.prc_option. The following are required for a carrier to obtain and keep a HM safety permit:

1. Maintain a "satisfactory" safety rating in order to obtain and hold a safety permit.

2. Maintain their crash rating, and their driver, vehicle, hazardous materials or out-of service rating so they are not in the worse 30 percent of the national average as indicated in FMCSA's Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS).

Continue reading " Truck Accidents " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at Google.com Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at del.icio.us Digg Truck%20Accidents at Digg.com Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at Spurl.net Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at Simpy.com Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at NewsVine Blink this Truck%20Accidents at blinklist.com Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at Furl.net Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at reddit.com Fark Truck%20Accidents at Fark.com Bookmark Truck%20Accidents at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 3, 2008

Railroad Accidents

A young woman was charged with leaving the scene of an accident, among several other charges, after her car ended up on railroad tracks and allegedly caused an accident in Beaver, Pennsylvania. Although no injuries were reported, the car was hit by the train and left the conductor, as well as several passengers, in fear of the worst. The woman said she left the scene because she had a panic attack and didn’t know what to do. Although this situation is not typical, many train accidents are not the fault of those in the railroad industry and often deal with ordinary citizens who are unaware of what to do in such dangerous circumstances. The Federal Railroad Administration felt the lack of publicity on the causes of Missouri railroad accidents and ways to prevent such incidents to be a public disservice.

Continue reading " Railroad Accidents " »

Bookmark: Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at Google.com Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at del.icio.us Digg Railroad%20Accidents at Digg.com Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at Spurl.net Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at Simpy.com Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at NewsVine Blink this Railroad%20Accidents at blinklist.com Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at Furl.net Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at reddit.com Fark Railroad%20Accidents at Fark.com Bookmark Railroad%20Accidents at Yahoo! MyWeb
Posted On: April 1, 2008

Motorcycle Accidents

The U.S. Senate is currently reviewing a bill that would eliminate the requirement for motorcyclists over the age of 21 to wear a helmet. Requiring motorcyclists to wear a helmet is an issue every year in Missouri, but the law still requires helmet use.

Missouri, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety’s Fatality Report, is still one the most dangerous places to ride a motorcycle. Between 2002 and 2006, 390 motorcyclists died in Missouri motorcycle accidents. Twenty percent of those deaths had to do with wearing a helmet. Almost half of the deaths were the result of a motorcyclist being struck by another vehicle.

In terms of preventing injuries, motorcyclists can ensure their own safety by not only wearing a helmet, but also making sure the helmet meets certain safety standards. There are several things to look at when choosing a motorcycle helmet. The following items should always be considered:

1. Certification

Certain markings, such as a Department of Transportation sticker, means that the helmet is ideal for head protection.

2. Coverage

Generally, a full face h